Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:57:33 -0400
From:      Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
To:        Kalle =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F8ller?=  <freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Portsnap vs CSup
Message-ID:  <p06240800c5e8c460e6a6@[128.113.24.47]>
In-Reply-To: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 7:39 PM +0100 3/19/09, Kalle M=F8ller wrote:
>Hi
>
>I've been digging around, but I can't find a clear answer, which of those
>two is the "correct" to use. Hence I don't use one now, so if I'm going to
>learn one, I would prefer it to be the right one.

That's a reasonable question to ask.  Unfortunately, the answer is "it
depends on what you want"...  For my use (as more of a developer), I
go with csup or cvsup for most of my machines.  But on the slower
machines that I have, portsnap might be a better choice.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =3D   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06240800c5e8c460e6a6>