Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:17:30 -0700 From: David Kirchner <dpk@dpk.net> To: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Cody Holland <cholland@redmoonbroadband.com> Subject: Re: Patch vs. Upgrade Message-ID: <35c231bf0510121317s4fac9a7bq545639d169db06eb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420510121243w10326da7p6454f499a0050d1b@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F8316489986467895@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> <35c231bf0510121155h55f8fae8r93fb25a9f01ca3f4@mail.gmail.com> <cb5206420510121243w10326da7p6454f499a0050d1b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/12/05, Andrew P. <infofarmer@gmail.com> wrote: > That's just not true. Cvsupping to something like > RELENG_5_4 will do exactly the same thing as > a patch, only it's the hassle-free way. You see > a sec-advisory, you type "cvsup -g -L 2 mysup" > recompile what's suggested in the advisory, or > the whole world - and you're done. cvsupping to RELENG_5_4 will include all of those patches, not just the one you just read about. So if you had to avoid installing a patch for some reason (you had a local solution, or something, it happens sometimes) then you need to avoid using the cvsup method.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35c231bf0510121317s4fac9a7bq545639d169db06eb>