Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Jan 2004 11:44:56 -0500
From:      Richard Coleman <richardcoleman@mindspring.com>
To:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Gearing up for 64-bit time_t on sparc64
Message-ID:  <40096688.7040304@mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06020462bc280acc00da@[128.113.24.47]>
References:  <200312212239.38557.craig@xfoil.gank.org> <p0602040fbc0cf0dddf9e@[128.113.24.47]> <p06020426bc1fe1f269d8@[128.113.24.47]> <20040106095942.O66232@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040106182824.GA42422@dragon.nuxi.com> <p0602042abc2138069732@[128.113.24.47]> <20040107174346.GA50142@dragon.nuxi.com> <p06020452bc2549a6ba9e@[128.113.24.47]> <20040111093043.GA11120@dragon.nuxi.com> <p06020462bc280acc00da@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Any idea on when we might make the jump to 64 bit time_t?  We probably 
want to do it soon, and give ourselves a few months before the release. 
  That way, there will be plenty of time to fix any troubles with ports.

a HEADS UP on freebsd-current might be a good idea soon.

Richard Coleman
richardcoleman@mindspring.com

Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Well, that took longer than I expected.  I had typo-ed 'make'
> at one point, and didn't notice for awhile...
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/installworld_nk
> 
> Is the magic script.  Probably a little more elaborate than it
> needs to be, but I had plenty of extra time while waiting for
> 'make buildworld' to finish...  This is the version I just
> used for a successful upgrade, except that I just added the
> if-clause to also copy 'xinstall' as the 'install' command.
> Given how much 'install' is called during 'installworld', I
> wonder why it isn't included in the files that are copied
> by the standard 'make installworld' target.
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/UPDATING.64BTT
> 
> This is a possible writeup which could be committed at the
> same time as the script.  Right now it's partially written
> for people willing to help *test* the above change, and
> partially written as if the 64-bit change has already been
> committed, and this is telling everyone how to update to it.
> So, it isn't perfect, but it does contain my complete and
> explicit list of steps that I believe people should follow.
> 
> The one thing I haven't tested yet is a rebuild of modula-3 and
> cvsup on a 64-bit system, but I have that going right now.
> 





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40096688.7040304>