Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 09:33:01 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/i386 bfd.h Message-ID: <20040418163301.GA64947@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20040418162431.GI12383@ip.net.ua> References: <200404181609.i3IG9XA1099515@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040418162431.GI12383@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 07:24:31PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 09:09:33AM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > obrien 2004/04/18 09:09:33 PDT > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/i386 bfd.h > > Log: > > Revert rev 1.21 which configured with --enable-64-bit-bfd. > > GDB 5.2 can't handle a 64-bit BFD on a 32-bit host. > > We can revisit configuring with --enable-64-bit-bfd when we get a modern GDB. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.22 +1 -1 src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/i386/bfd.h > > > Hmm. :-( I have 6.1 pre-release in perforce. I plan to import that alongside gdb 5.2 as soon as 6.1 is announced. People can pound on it while I finish support for kernel debugging. If enough people get their hands dirty we can remove gdb 5.2 in time for FreeBSD 5.3. If people can tell my why again we wanted --enable-64-bit-bfd, I can work that in (or not). -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040418163301.GA64947>