Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:00:55 -0500 (CDT)
From:      mark tinguely <tinguely@hookie.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu>
To:        grog@lemis.com, tony@aracnet.com
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Filesystem sizes for 4.x ?
Message-ID:  <200008301400.JAA20739@hookie.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20000830155709.A34589@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

additional file system concerns.

disk/controller traffic balance. if multiple drives and disk controllers
are used you can place swaps, file systems on different drives to spread
the I/O load. This is becoming less important today, since RAID is used
on larger systems.

disk quotas work for a partition. obviously users generally
don't add files to /usr and in / with the exception of /tmp and /var.
If quota management of these directories are needed, then they should
be in a separate partition from /. /tmp and /var are also the directories
that cause the root file system to overflow and cause the potential loss
of important files.

another special file system need is inodes. some file systems have many,
tiny files (such as news spools). the file system that holds these tiny
files needs to have special file systems with many more inodes created
that would be a waste on general filesytems.

remotely mounted file systems. only some subdirectory are needed to be
mounted remotely. though it is possible to mount inside a larger partition
it may be easier for maintenance to keep the mounted directories separate.

--mark tinguely


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008301400.JAA20739>