Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:35:55 -0400
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        "Pietro Cerutti" <pietro.cerutti@gmail.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: UFS2 Snapshot limitiations
Message-ID:  <20070313143555.ee27a265.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <e572718c0703131114t66db9547x610f8771148fcdd3@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <64784.69.129.174.18.1173797935.squirrel@email.polands.org> <20070313111029.49bd1d14.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <53038.69.129.174.18.1173799128.squirrel@email.polands.org> <e572718c0703131114t66db9547x610f8771148fcdd3@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to "Pietro Cerutti" <pietro.cerutti@gmail.com>:

> On 3/13/07, Doug Poland <doug@polands.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, March 13, 2007 10:10, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > In response to "Doug Poland" <doug@polands.org>:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> I seem to recall, but cannot find, the limitation on the number of
> > >> snapshots allowed on UFS2.  Could someone point me in the right
> > >> direction please?
> > >
> > > The handbook has it:
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/snapshots.html
> > >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> 
> Sorry for joining the thread, but it's raised my curiosity: what's the
> reason for this limit?

I'm not 100% sure, but I believe it's because snapshot information is stored
in the filesystem superblock, and that's all that can fit in the space
available in the superblock.

-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070313143555.ee27a265.wmoran>