Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:21:50 +0200 From: Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libutil in Debian Message-ID: <CAOfDtXOTsXPHQUxb25c6hauwZdPCPLdMhNH%2BMXq0PKfY_ozTbw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51DC4712.20707@coosemans.org> References: <CAOfDtXN2fWQAyGNb_ifH9y=zHO%2BGGnSdWnD8C6BzWDTU_7rWFQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130709113553.GP67810@FreeBSD.org> <CAOfDtXOTqzF9=s%2BUv6%2BMoAu0nrmyGrxJz4xaSJYEfDzRvrKx8g@mail.gmail.com> <20130709165939.GP91021@kib.kiev.ua> <0657575A-BF3A-486F-9582-C01E0FD97E38@bsdimp.com> <51DC4712.20707@coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2013/7/9 Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>: > > Or just a libbsdutil.so symlink? Works for me. A symlink would allow us to rename the library in a way that doesn't break compatibility with FreeBSD. Does this solution make everyone happy? -- Robert Millan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfDtXOTsXPHQUxb25c6hauwZdPCPLdMhNH%2BMXq0PKfY_ozTbw>