Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:08:52 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Clifton Royston <cliftonr@lava.net> Subject: Re: Sticky/sgid/suid bits safe on regular files? Message-ID: <xzpeko8koa3.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200406221659.31501.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> (Daniel O'Connor's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:59:31 %2B0930") References: <20040617205549.GA19254@lava.net> <xzpisdkkqru.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200406221659.31501.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> writes: > I think he wanted to use sticky/sgid/suid because they get removed when t= he > file is changed no they don't. > so the application can go back and see if they've been > changed. That doesn't happen to attributes. > > Also, I don't think attributes work over NFS(?) they should, at least with v4. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpeko8koa3.fsf>