Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:28:38 +0000
From:      Howard Jones <howie@thingy.com>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [freebsd-questions] [freebsd-questions] root login with telnetd
Message-ID:  <45F3E7E6.6060908@thingy.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070311120541.Y90539@chylonia.3miasto.net>
References:  <20070310224946.K10353@chylonia.3miasto.net>	<20070311081618.F66000@chylonia.3miasto.net>	<45F3DF87.1090503@thingy.com> <20070311120541.Y90539@chylonia.3miasto.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> so generalizing that "telnet and rsh is bad" is as stupid as telling 
> that oxygen is bad as it makes fires.
Well, that's true, but if you have the choice, there are better choices. 
You *can* hammer in nails with the butt of a gun, but there's a chance 
you'll somehow shoot yourself in the arm. A hammer doesn't have that risk.

There have been *many* problems over the years with rsh and telnet. 
rsh's security model comes from a time when people thought computers 
would never lie to each other. SSH does allow you to give only enough 
access, with the side-benefits (in your case) of compression and 
encryption. Even if you used ssh without those, the key-based 
authentication is still safer, and the code more modern and securely 
designed.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45F3E7E6.6060908>