From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 10:10:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 10:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EE343D45 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 10:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 12973 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 17:10:11 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 14 May 2004 17:10:11 -0000 Received: from 10.50.40.205 (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4EHA4cx027634; Fri, 14 May 2004 13:10:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:10:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <40A32FB4.2030601@paradise.net.nz> <200405131507.05183.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <40A497F1.9000506@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <40A497F1.9000506@paradise.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405141310.32455.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: SMP disables USB mass storage in Freebsd 4.9 RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:10:13 -0000 On Friday 14 May 2004 05:57 am, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Hi John, thanks for the swift reply, > > with respect to 5.x, I did run 5.1 for a while, but 4.9 seemed to have > better performance for the stuff I tend to do (typically database / io > intensive), so would like to keep using 4.9 until the 5.x tree gets to a > similar level - however, I have not tried 5.2....so may be out of date > with my impression...:-) > > > Which IRQ does uhci0 (or ohci0) get? > > Think its uhci0 - and, err.. how do I tell which IRQ it gets ? dmesg | grep uhci0 should show that. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org