From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 11 15:53:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FF71065670 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:53:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657858FC13 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id nBBFnqIs006500; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:49:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id nBBFnogl006499; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:49:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:49:50 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20091211154950.GA6418@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20091210144141.GB834@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091210095122.a164bf95.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <11167f520912102342y349ebf03tccf886da0ecf53e9@mail.gmail.com> <20091211093023.009125d9.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B2207A6.7070204@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B2207A6.7070204@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:07:14 +0000 Cc: Polytropon , Bill Moran , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." , Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root exploit for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:53:40 -0000 On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:49:42AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:42:36 -0600, "Sam Fourman Jr." > > wrote: > >> I have tried looking around and OpenBSD appears to be the undisputed > >> #1 track record in terms of security and FreeBSD is #2 (I didn't count > >> dragonflyBSD) > > > > VMS would be #0, then? :-) > > I dunno. Haven't seen many MS-DOS exploits recently either... Chuckle Chuckle Chuckle. I haven't either. Don't see much MS-DOS network activity either... ////jerry > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 > 7 Priory Courtyard > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW, UK >