Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:20:46 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: swap-related problems
Message-ID:  <37179B9E.D4434460@newsguy.com>
References:  <000001be8842$6ef48410$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
David Schwartz wrote:
> 
> > Sure. We call it limiting a process/user datasize. This solution is
> > not more complicated than any other solution short of full
> > pre-allocation, even if you do not believe so.
> 
>         You seem to be under the impression that I am looking for a _simple_
> solution. I am not. I am looking for a _good_ solution. And while
> process/user datasize limits are certainly part of a solution, I think I've
> already clearly demonstrated that they are not adequate.

Feel free to submit patches. 

--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	"Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..."




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37179B9E.D4434460>