From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Apr 16 13:32:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C663E14DF0 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:32:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id FAA29624; Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:30:16 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37179B9E.D4434460@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:20:46 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schwartz Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: swap-related problems References: <000001be8842$6ef48410$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Schwartz wrote: > > > Sure. We call it limiting a process/user datasize. This solution is > > not more complicated than any other solution short of full > > pre-allocation, even if you do not believe so. > > You seem to be under the impression that I am looking for a _simple_ > solution. I am not. I am looking for a _good_ solution. And while > process/user datasize limits are certainly part of a solution, I think I've > already clearly demonstrated that they are not adequate. Feel free to submit patches. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message