Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:53:16 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        r.p.demarco@att.net
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Can 10M Buffer Ceiling be lowere?
Message-ID:  <20041201035316.GA20429@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041201032716.8FBA043D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20041201032716.8FBA043D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:27:11AM +0000, r.p.demarco@att.net wrote:
>      A technical question:
>=20
>      I have an old NEC computer (c. 1997) running 5.3-RELEASE with
> 48M of RAM.  Getting a new computer isn't an option right now, but
> I would like to get as much out of my memory as possible.
>      My /boot/kernel/kernel file is about 3M, and from the initial
> boot:=20
> 		real memory  =3D 50331648 (48 MB)
> 		avail memory =3D 43896832 (41 MB)
> it appears this kernel takes up about 7M of memory with one screen saver
> kld loaded.  With a few unneeded services (cron, sendmail) disabled, I
> start off with about 26M free after a fresh reboot with just root logged =
in,
> running `top'.  Looking at top, I noticed:
>=20
>                 Mem: 4320K Active, 15M Inact, 12M Wired, 10M Buf, 11M Free
>                                                          ^^^
>=20
>      From TOP(1):
>=20
>                 Buf: number of pages used for BIO-level disk caching
>=20
>      Actually, the 10M is after some disk usage (it starts ~6M).
> It never gets above 10M.  Is there anyway to adjust this, to
> (say) a maximum of 5M?  Yes, a new 256 MB RAM system would be nice,
> but until then, I would like to avoid serious paging running xclock :)
> Thanks,

There's no point, that memory will be used if demanded.  Note that you
still have 11M free in your example, so throwing away 6MB that is used
for caching would only *reduce* performance.

Kris

--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBrUAsWry0BWjoQKURAvDIAKCo3JETaDZgVQaZkTF+5kkoXZQ4ggCgyDFM
bEkMBZiuvQuJ3H8062gRcBg=
=NBok
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041201035316.GA20429>