Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:30:32 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r344479 - head/sys/mips/conf Message-ID: <20190223103032.GG2420@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <201902230000.x1N00o8R011357@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201902230000.x1N00o8R011357@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:00:50AM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Author: sobomax > Date: Sat Feb 23 00:00:49 2019 > New Revision: 344479 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344479 > > Log: > o Get rid of silly comment which seems to have got life of its own via > copy-and-paste process; > > o Return geom_uzip(4) usage back to how manual page prescribes it to be > used while I am here. > > Modified: > head/sys/mips/conf/AP94 > head/sys/mips/conf/DIR-825B1 > head/sys/mips/conf/ROUTERSTATION_MFS > head/sys/mips/conf/RSPRO_MFS > head/sys/mips/conf/WZR-300HP > head/sys/mips/conf/WZR-HPAG300H To put this commit into some perspective: - removal of 'device geom_uzip' is the part of the still discussed https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19266; - of course the removal there conflicts with the uncommitted patch, requiring me to spend time handling the conflict; - as a happy coincidence the patch is incomplete leaving a lot more 'device geom_uzip' in sys/mips/conf files - I have to explain all of that to some people outside the svn-src@ (see the tag line in the review) and try to smooth out the naturally uprising attitude. I am curious, do you think that the rush to remove the comment worth the outcome ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190223103032.GG2420>