Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:11:14 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Noor Dawod <noor@comrax.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about two NIC's Message-ID: <20011003221114.H563@k7.mavetju.org> In-Reply-To: <PHEBIOJOBJJLIIJCOINKOEDEEEAA.noor@comrax.com>; from noor@comrax.com on Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:59:47PM %2B0200 References: <20011003214855.C559@k7.mavetju.org> <PHEBIOJOBJJLIIJCOINKOEDEEEAA.noor@comrax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:59:47PM +0200, Noor Dawod wrote: > Thank you for your reply. If you could further help me, I'd be greatful. > Although both NIC's appear to be UP, I cannot send a ping on one > network. Observe our network: > > fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 194.90.246.124 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 194.90.246.255 > ether 00:d0:b7:b6:0e:2e > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > status: active > xl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 172.22.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.22.1.255 > ether 00:10:5a:a5:a5:62 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > status: active > lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > As you can see, xl0 is connected to an Intranet network (a dummy network > used for backup). When trying to ping two IP's, look what happens: > > (pinging a true IP in the Internet) > PING 194.90.1.5 (194.90.1.5): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 194.90.1.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=0.923 ms > 64 bytes from 194.90.1.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=0.411 ms > 64 bytes from 194.90.1.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=1.042 ms > > (ping an IP in the 172.22.1.x space) > PING 172.22.1.1 (172.22.1.1): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: Permission denied > ping: sendto: Permission denied > ping: sendto: Permission denied This message looks like there is something wrong with your firewall rules regarding the xl0 interface. If "netstat -rn" show that 172.22 should go to xl0 then there is nothing wrong with the routing-table. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011003221114.H563>