From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 19:24:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA21297
          for stable-outgoing; Sat, 3 Feb 1996 19:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA21288
          for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 3 Feb 1996 19:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA28245; Sat, 3 Feb 1996 20:26:56 -0700
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 20:26:56 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199602040326.UAA28245@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Any objection to bringing the sup sources from current into -stable?
In-Reply-To: <25913.823386180@time.cdrom.com>
References: <25913.823386180@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> It would make my life easier, actually.

I don't have a problem.  It only used by developers, so I suspect any
bugs would have been found in -current anyway.


Nate