From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 02:32:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A17837B401 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 02:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dire.bris.ac.uk (dire.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEE043F85 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 02:32:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk by dire.bris.ac.uk with SMTP-PRIV with ESMTP; Thu, 1 May 2003 10:32:40 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 19BAP9-0001oL-00; Thu, 01 May 2003 10:31:03 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:31:03 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: milan In-Reply-To: <20030501053301.GF2778@eesh.lebox.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant cc: questions Subject: Re: SMP bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 09:32:52 -0000 On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, milan wrote: > i was confused by this: This part, presumably? > SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! > SMP: CPU2 apic_initialize(): > lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x00000010 SVR: 0x000001ff > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > SMP: CPU1 apic_initialize(): > lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x00000010 SVR: 0x000001ff > SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! > SMP: CPU3 apic_initialize(): > lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x00000010 SVR: 0x000001ff One CPU is already running to get to that point. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ printf 'cat\nhello world' | `sh -c 'read c; echo $c'`