Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:49:49 -0800
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Pentium 4 optimization status
Message-ID:  <20030126234949.GA25057@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030126233941.GA61926@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <5.2.0.9.1.20030126113718.00b85bd0@tommy.sdodson.com> <20030126233941.GA61926@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:39:41PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:37:59AM -0500, Scott Dodson wrote:
> > Is it still unsafe to build everything with p4 optimizations?
> 
> Yes.  Well actually the issue is sse[2] problems.  Other Pent-4
> optimizations should be safe.
> 

David,

Are you still the gcc guy?  I was scanning the GCC mailing list
and it appears that a gcc 3.2.2 will be released with only bug
and regression fixes.  Are there any FreeBSD fixes that we should
try to push into 3.2.2?

-- 
Steve

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030126234949.GA25057>