From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 3 17: 6:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A595B37B401 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCEDE43E6A for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:06:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com) Received: from pc016247.reshall.uidaho.edu (john?m?cooper@129.101.136.30 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2002 00:06:42 -0000 Subject: Re: RFC: Putting mozilla-1.0 back in the tree From: John Merryweather Cooper Reply-To: john_m_cooper@yahoo.com To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1031094955.330.38.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> References: <1031083190.330.3.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <1031084507.1735.30.camel@PC016247.reshall.uidaho.edu> <1031084580.330.13.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <1031090031.1735.58.camel@PC016247.reshall.uidaho.edu> <1031094955.330.38.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 03 Sep 2002 17:07:46 -0700 Message-Id: <1031098067.1735.67.camel@PC016247.reshall.uidaho.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Excellent! However, there's a problem with the startup script for www/mozilla-devel. It reads cd /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla when it should read cd /usr/X11R6/bin/mozilla-devel An easy fix . . . jmc On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 16:15, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 17:53, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > > Another minor problem, but easily fixed for those of us who only want > > the -devel version whenever possible--the x11/gnome metaport is going to > > now force me to suck down with the 1.0.x version along with the -devel. > > Could gnome ad a knob to allow me bypass building mozilla if I have > > mozilla-devel? I'm willing to live with mozilla-embedded and > > mozilla-headers for nautilus and galeon, but I want mozilla-devel for my > > default GNOME browser without the ambiguity of multiple versions > > floating around. > > Done. If you define WITH_MOZILLA_DEVEL when building gnome-fifth-toe, > you will get mozilla-1.1. By default, mozilla-1.0 will be installed. > > Joe > > > > > jmc > > > > On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 13:23, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 16:21, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > > > > Well, while I can see why why Mozilla 1.1 would be considered "bleeding > > > > edge" (it has a lot of extra features), and I can see why some would > > > > prefer Mozilla 1.0.x (because features cause bulk, etc.), to me, 1.1 is > > > > the release. For instance, the browser that IBM brands and releases for > > > > OS/2 is Mozilla 1.1 (which is on my lap top at the moment). Since I > > > > like my (two) different platforms to have similar browsers, I'd be > > > > inclined to a -stable and -current distinction. But people get all > > > > wrapped up about vocabulary, so that's not critical. > > > > > > The bleeding edge thing comes right off of www.mozilla.org: > > > > > > "This is our latest bleeding edge release which contains all the changes > > > that happened on the trunk since we branched for Mozilla 1.0." > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > The bottom line is that I like 1.1 (I just wish the performance of 1.1 > > > > with respect to Java was as fast on FreeBSD as it is on OS/2). > > > > > > > > YMMV. > > > > > > > > jmc > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 12:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > I'm in the process of putting Mozilla 1.0 back in the tree as > > > > > www/mozilla, and moving Mozilla 1.1 to www/mozilla-devel. It seems from > > > > > the Mozilla release cycle diagram that they are planning a Mozilla 1.0.1 > > > > > and, if necessary, a 1.0.2 release, and 1.1 is still "bleeding edge." > > > > > > > > > > To that end, I have a question. Should I bump the PORTEPOCH of > > > > > www/mozilla again, or just nudge people who upgraded to change the > > > > > origin of mozilla 1.1 to mozilla-devel? I think the latter, but I > > > > > wanted to get some feedback on this. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > > > -- > > > > _ > > > > | |V| / ' || MacroHard -- \ > > > > \_| | | \_, || the perfection of form over | > > > > ----------------------------------|| substance, marketing over | > > > > Web: http://www.borgsdemons.com || performance, and greed over | > > > > AIM: johnmcooper || design . . . | > > > > Yahoo: john_m_cooper || | > > > > =====================================================================/ > > > > Public Key: http://www.borgsdemons.com/Personal/pgpkey.asc | > > > > =====================================================================\ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > _ > > | |V| / ' || MacroHard -- \ > > \_| | | \_, || the perfection of form over | > > ----------------------------------|| substance, marketing over | > > Web: http://www.borgsdemons.com || performance, and greed over | > > AIM: johnmcooper || design . . . | > > Yahoo: john_m_cooper || | > > =====================================================================/ > > Public Key: http://www.borgsdemons.com/Personal/pgpkey.asc | > > =====================================================================\ > > > > -- _ | |V| / ' || MacroHard -- \ \_| | | \_, || the perfection of form over | ----------------------------------|| substance, marketing over | Web: http://www.borgsdemons.com || performance, and greed over | AIM: johnmcooper || design . . . | Yahoo: john_m_cooper || | =====================================================================/ Public Key: http://www.borgsdemons.com/Personal/pgpkey.asc | =====================================================================\ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message