Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:26:39 +0200 From: Nicolas Rachinsky <list@rachinsky.de> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports Message-ID: <20040524152639.GA12607@pc5.i.0x5.de> In-Reply-To: <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]> References: <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> [2004-05-24 00:07 -0400]: > The third proposal is basically: > a) move most "standard" files into a new pkg-data > file, as described in previous proposals, except > for pkg-descr and "patch" files. > b) create a new directory at the root directory of > the ports collection. That directory would be > called "Patches", and inside would be a directory > for each category. Inside each Patches/category > directory would be a single-file for each port > in that category, where that single-file would > have all the "ports-collection patches" for the > matching port. I hoep I haven't missed something obvious, but what about local patches and Makefile.local? Will they continue to work? Nicolas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040524152639.GA12607>