Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:42:30 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port Message-ID: <200511090742.34222.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAAwDSDOzhsU2rBtGtW4YaQsKAAAAQAAAAsX7319CI50%2Bf5uN/kLBz9gEAAAAA@gmail.com> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAAwDSDOzhsU2rBtGtW4YaQsKAAAAQAAAAsX7319CI50%2Bf5uN/kLBz9gEAAAAA@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1681640.fJV40kiXpq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 November 2005 02:50 am, George Katsanos wrote: > is there any way [or do you know the exact port] that will save me from > installing kde base , kde , kdelibs and zillions of kde stuff [which I ha= te] > at my computer? No. The reason is that Konqueror *is* KDE in a very real sense. It has ve= ry=20 little functionality on its own, but instead uses parts of other packages t= o=20 do all its work. Even such "minor" things as fetching files via HTTP are=20 farmed out to KIO-slaves from other packages. Konqueror is probably more likely than any other KDE program to have an=20 enormous number of dependencies. That's by design and not really something= =20 that could be stripped down. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1681640.fJV40kiXpq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDcfzK5sRg+Y0CpvERAik2AJ47vroQa82ZpKVt1wSFgEYxc3VVpQCfeXpK n4qoyYyjKG1ycxU402ZEwoU= =umsC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1681640.fJV40kiXpq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511090742.34222.kirk>