From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 30 23:31:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from scales.belcom.ru (scales.belcom.ru [213.141.192.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B723F37B6C5 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:31:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from crow (crow.belcom.ru [213.141.192.74]) by scales.belcom.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA71734 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:31:16 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <00d301c08b57$cc06fec0$4ac08dd5@belcom.ru> From: "Alexei Betin" To: References: <00b701c08b52$a4c49660$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Subject: Re: the way freebsd to be patched is sick Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:31:16 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, > I'm sorry you don't like the way that the Open > Source community does things. I would suggest that > if you don't care to get source patches that you pay > the $1000 per year per server to BSDi to put your > servers under a FreeBSD service contract. I'm quite > sure that if you do this that BSDi will be more than > happy to supply you with all the binary patches that > you want. no point. there is at least enother one well known open source os that provides binary patches. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message