Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:06:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: "Doug Poland" <doug@polands.org> Cc: <questions@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-database@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: FreeBSD v Linux Message-ID: <14838.20032.679482.383041@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIACECOENAA.doug@polands.org> References: <14838.17813.655452.705133@guru.mired.org> <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIACECOENAA.doug@polands.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Poland writes: > Well, that makes sense. Think of FreeBSD as a Linux distribution > and get them to support that. I may be beating a dead horse, but > how would that help (in the Sybase realm) with connectivity libraries > like Sybase-DB or Sybase-CT. These Sybase libraries are needed for > interfaces like PHP to speak to Sybase? I'm sure the other major > RDBMs have similar libraries. I honestly don't know. Can you link FreeBSD binaries against static Linux libraries and get sane results? Can a binary use shared libraries for both Linux (via emulation) and FreeBSD? I know you can run a Linux cross-compiler on FreeBSD with Linux emulation and get binaries that run under that emulation. If worst comes to worst, you could do that. <mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-database" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14838.20032.679482.383041>