From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 30 15:59:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from shadowmere.student.utwente.nl (wit401305.student.utwente.nl [130.89.236.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290F737B4C5 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:59:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by shadowmere.student.utwente.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E258B1F2F; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:59:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:59:22 +0100 From: Pascal Hofstee To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: ANSI C++ long long issues Message-ID: <20001031005922.A89125@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl> Reply-To: daeron@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, After returning from a month long vacation, i updated my CURRENT system to the recent CVS. After this update my Mozilla Tinderbox-builds seem to suffer from a configure complaining my C++ compiler has a "-pedanctic long long" bug. [part of config.log] configure:10680: c++ -o conftest -pthread -O -pedantic -I/usr/X11R6/include conftest.C -lutil -lm 1>&5 configure: In function `int main()': configure:10676: warning: ANSI C++ does not support `long long' configure: failed program was: #line 10671 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" void exit(int); #endif int main () { if (sizeof(long long) != 8) { return 1; } return 0; } This problem has never occurred earlier. I am wondering if this is actual supposed behaviour that got recently introduced, or if there is actually something wrong with the C++ compiler currently in CURRENT. I can of course bypass the problem by specific --disable-pedantic but i'd rather not do that. -- Pascal Hofstee < daeron @ shadowmere . student . utwente . nl > begin LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs I'm a signature virus. Please copy me and help me spread. end To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message