Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 09:47:25 +0900 From: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bsd.ruby.mk, bsd.gnome.mk, ... etc. Message-ID: <200009040047.e840lPG01214@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 03 Sep 2000 23:44:42 %2B0900" <867l8tilgl.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> References: <86g0nl8yr3.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <86d7ilj1eg.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <vqchf7xx2ci.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200009031145.e83BiwG85980@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> <867l8tilgl.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 03 Sep 2000 23:44:42 +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote: > > The idea seems fine, however, it'd better check if each file exists > instead of predefining INCLUDEMK_CATEGORIES: I hoped like those too :-) > Incidentally, bsd.emacs.mk should probably be renamed bsd.elisp.mk to > accomplish this. (I'm CC'ing this mail to the MAINTAINER of it) I prefer to bsd.emacs.mk, and ports which have `elisp' category might be changed to bsd.emacs.mk. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009040047.e840lPG01214>