Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:32:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Smith@ian.org To: Loren Koss <loren@pciway.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFilter NAT.. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007211129290.10000-100000@user1.erieonline.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007210818240.4835-100000@unix.pciway.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Loren Koss wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 Smith@ian.org wrote: > > I just tried... > > > > rdr wb0 x.x.x.x/32 port 79 -> y.y.y.y port 79 tcp > > rdr wb0 x.x.x.x/32 port 13 -> y.y.y.y port 13 tcp > > > > ...and could telnet to both port 79 and 13 on y.y.y.y with no > > problems. What isn't working for you? > > > Whoa.. from outside your network you could telnet to y.y.y.y?? For me, I > wont be able to since it is a 192.168.1.x network.. from inside my > network, sure I can telnet to it.. Did you mean you could telnet to > x.x.x.x 79 and 13? I should have been more clear. :-) I could telnet to x.x.x.x at port 79 or 13 and it connected me to the propper ports on y.y.y.y. y.y.y.y was an internal, unroutable address on mine too. IPFilter seems to be working well for me in 4.1-RC, but I have not done real extensive testing. -- Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0007211129290.10000-100000>