From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 19 22:16:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF40B16A4CE; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:16:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4077B43D45; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:16:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6JMGAcW008652; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:16:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)i6JE5DpW001999; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:05:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])i6JDg3An067092; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:42:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200407191342.i6JDg3An067092@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: obrien@NUXI.com In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jul 2004 03:54:59 PDT." <20040719105459.GA85349@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:42:03 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Mark Murray cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:16:24 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:55:32PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > markm 2004-07-18 18:55:32 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > . Makefile > > Log: > > Rename a preposterously long name with one that might look a bit > > more professional. While here, write a few lines of explanatory > > text to explain what its for. > > It perposeallly was not documented, nor should it be documented. On that point, let's just agree to differ, OK? > Else it could become popular and the normal thing our users do -- leading > to claims it is too dangerous and lets users shoot their foot off and > some committer go and try to "fix" this knob. Thats why the words I wrote suggested that this was not a good idea. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH