Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 07:12:16 -0700 From: Scott Likens <damm@fpsn.net> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/lft Makefile ports/net/lft/files patch-lft.c Message-ID: <1065017536.4056.1.camel@desolation.livid.de> In-Reply-To: <20031001133904.GR551@straylight.oblivion.bg> References: <200309301227.h8UCRg5J081765@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031001133904.GR551@straylight.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 06:39, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 05:27:42AM -0700, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > edwin 2003/09/30 05:27:42 PDT > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > net/lft Makefile > > net/lft/files patch-lft.c > > Log: > > patch for net/lft > > > > ports/net/lft has a slight problem on 4.x servers > > > > GCC 2.95 does not support atol on 4.x, where as 5.x has > > atol, to solve this slight problem we must use either a > > version check, or use depreciated atoll > > > > Informed maintainer. > > However, my 4.9-RC doesn't have atoll(3) at all - neither as a manpage, > nor even in the src/lib/libc/stdlib/ sources. How about the following > patch, which makes it use strtoll(3) instead? > > G'luck, > Peter Yes, 4.x does not have atol, it should have atoll instead. If this can be verified that atoll has been removed from 4.9 please let me know. But rest assured, it is there. If not, some major catastrophy has happened and the world has ended. Scott.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1065017536.4056.1.camel>