Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 20:44:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Miod Vallat <miod@online.fr> To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weekly report on Yeeloong progress Message-ID: <huouem$u2q$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <4C0C1EF4.9070609@gmail.com> <AANLkTin2dNjQWNj2Us7HtXX05Y-Euk0NNUjQI47R1wUT@mail.gmail.com> <4C0FF206.308@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes I did. It's documented on pages 56, 58 and 61 of Loongson 2F manual. > The difference is in wider PFN and PageMask and presence of no-execute > bit. If all unknown bit are zeroed it shouldn't be any problem. But it > will be useful in future for sure. I am not sure the NX bit is actually implemented in the 2F. It sounds like a leftover of the 2E documentation, and unfortunately neither the 2E nor the 2F documentation mention what kind of exception is generated at ITLB refill time when the TLB entry has the NX bit set.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?huouem$u2q$1>