Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:21:04 +0100 From: Mike Bristow <mike@urgle.com> To: Charles Randall <crandall@matchlogic.com> Cc: Dan Moschuk <dan@FreeBSD.ORG>, Greg Thompson <johnnyteardrop@hotmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: threadsafe name resolution Message-ID: <20000809192104.A15793@lindt.urgle.com> In-Reply-To: <5FE9B713CCCDD311A03400508B8B301302978F3E@bdr-xcln.is.matchlogic.com>; from crandall@matchlogic.com on Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:07:01PM -0600 References: <5FE9B713CCCDD311A03400508B8B301302978F3E@bdr-xcln.is.matchlogic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:07:01PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote: > Is there a reason that ADNS won't work for this? Firstly, adns doesn't do IPv6 (at least not yet, according to the web page you gave). Secondly, I'm not sure if it's thread safe (although being nice 'n async it's not hard to use it in threaded apps even if it isn't). Thirdly, adns is GPLed, which means you'll have a hell of a job getting people to include it into the base system. -- Mike Bristow, seebitwopie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000809192104.A15793>