From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 24 01:07:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB1016A41F for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB23443D6B for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8NNrU3p067913; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:53:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Martin Nilsson Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:46:59 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200509211550.27524.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <43325114.4090907@gneto.com> In-Reply-To: <43325114.4090907@gneto.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509231947.01537.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050919/1099/Fri Sep 23 16:29:28 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD multicore detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:07:43 -0000 On Thursday 22 September 2005 02:37 am, Martin Nilsson wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > New patch is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/multicore.diff > > > > Please test and let me know. I don't have multicore CPU to test > > it for myself. :-( > > The below is on a Pentium D 820 (Dualcore). I don't like that the > two cores are reported as hyperthreading when the CPU does not > support hyperthreading (only the 840 EE does). If we ship 6.0 with > HT disabled I'm afraid that it will turn off one of the cores, > right? I wrote something to understand your situation: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/cpuid.c Can you send me the output? Thanks, Jung-uk Kim