Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 02:32:03 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Tao <taob@risc.org> To: David Langford <langfod@dihelix.com> Cc: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS-L <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, FREEBSD-ISP-L <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: "interfaces" patch to BIND (was Re: problem with over 133 virutal domains with apache on 2.1.7) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970330022651.4082F-100000@alpha.risc.org> In-Reply-To: <199703300713.VAA01023@caliban.dihelix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 29 Mar 1997, David Langford wrote:
>
> Any reasons that we cant add something like this to the default
> named? I assume that if you dont have an "interface" line that it
> acts nomrally.
Right. There is also another patch that adds the "permnets"
directive. It allows you to specify which physical interfaces will
respond to DNS queries (like on a firewall). It complements the
xfernets directive (which restricts zone transfers).
http://www.ers.ibm.com/~davy/software/bind.html
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org)
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970330022651.4082F-100000>