Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:43:24 +0000
From:      Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
Message-ID:  <4EE6595C.3080608@cran.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20198.21654.915449.536365@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
References:  <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE22421.9060707@gmail.com> <4EE6060D.5060201@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20111212155159.GB73597@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20198.21654.915449.536365@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/12/2011 19:23, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> Where do you get that idea?  I've never seen any evidence for this
> proposition (although the claim is repeated often enough).  What are
> the specific circumstances that make this useful?  Where did the
> number come from?

It's just something I've heard repeated, and people claiming that 
setting it improves performance.

This explains how the value 224 was obtained:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-September/058686.html

-- 
Bruce Cran



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE6595C.3080608>