Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:43:41 -0400 (EDT)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 2 patches for src/share/misc/bsd-family-tree
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20021010124341.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20021010162422.GA37496@freebsd.org.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 10-Oct-2002 Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:16:07PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> 
>> On 10-Oct-2002 Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:26:36AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> On 10-Oct-2002 Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:49:58AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> >> On 10-Oct-2002 Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:57:37PM +0400, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:26:21PM +0400, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> A little bug: release date of MacOSX 10.2 is 2002-08-23
>> >> >> >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2002/aug/23jaguar.html
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Here is a latest version of patch:
>> >> >> > http://ozz.pp.ru/patches/patch-bsd-family-tree
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > In addition of previous 2 patches is:
>> >> >> > 1) use tabs vs. spaces near NetBSD 1.5.3
>> >> >> > 2) fix "Unix history" URL
>> >> >> > 3) fix Mac OS X 10.1 release date
>> >> >> > (from http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2001/sep/25osxserver.html)
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Hmm, another PR on the same day says that OS X 10.1 was released on
>> >> >> September 29, but that OS X Server 10.1 was released on September
>> >> >> 25.  Also, the UNIX History page uses September 29.  However, it treats
>> >> >> OS X and OS X Server as different operating systems and it also uses
>> >> >> Sept 29 for both OS's.
>> >> > 
>> >> > But I find one more annonce about release date of Mac OS X 10.1:
>> >> > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2001/sep/25osx_available.html
>> >> > 
>> >> > Quotation:
>> >> > "SEYBOLD SF 2001, SAN FRANCISCO, Californiar-September 25, 2001-Apple(c)
>> >> >  today announced that Mac(c) OS X version 10.1..."
>> >> 
>> >> Read the whole thing, it says it will be available in stores that Saturday,
>> >> Sept 29. :)
>> > 
>> >:-)
>> > OK, following this way: FreeBSD 4.7 still not avaliable
>> > at stores, but bsd-family-tree say that it already avaliable :-)
>> > Does it correct?
>> 
>> The FreeBSD Project releases FreeBSD via FTP.  The official release
>> date for FreeBSD is thus when the announcement goes out on -announce
>> and the bits show up on ftp.FreeBSD.org.  Other companies sell FreeBSD
>> CD's and are not related to the Project.  OS X, on the other hand, is
>> a commercial product sold by a company.  The official release date for
>> commercial products is when it is released to customers via stores,
>> etc.  Even FreeBSD works in that model when you realize that FreeBSD
>> releases releases to customers when it puts them up on the FTP site.
> 
> OK. I understand your position. What do your think about following
> patch?
> 1) (real) sort "Time" section by alphabet
> 2) use <tab>'s vs. <space>'s near NetBSD 1.5.3
> 3) change Mac OS X 10.1 release date to 2001-09-2x :-)
> 
> Thanks.

Well, I actually went with the 29th for 10.1. (i.e., go with
OS X, not OS X Server dates).

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20021010124341.jhb>