From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 13 23:08:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA24242 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 23:08:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA24237 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 23:08:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 0yDl3m-0000e0-00; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 00:08:46 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA11125; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 00:08:32 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199803140708.AAA11125@harmony.village.org> To: John Birrell Subject: Re: binutils bloat Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 14:11:49 +1100." <199803140311.OAA16205@cimlogic.com.au> References: <199803140311.OAA16205@cimlogic.com.au> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 00:08:32 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199803140311.OAA16205@cimlogic.com.au> John Birrell writes: : Are people going to object if we keep _all_ the binutils source in : src/contrib/binutils so that we can define a few things in /etc/make.conf : and get cross tools out of a `make world'? I'm all for it. That's one of the features of NetBSD and OpenBSD that I miss... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message