From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 05:30:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF7616A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:30:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D4843D49 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:30:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAU5RQie042759; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:27:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:28:25 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20041129.222825.16682069.imp@bsdimp.com> To: doconnor@gsoft.com.au From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200411301456.19900.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200411292254.32943.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20041129.210554.32736622.imp@bsdimp.com> <200411301456.19900.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A hack to rebuild port KLDs during kernel builds X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:30:01 -0000 In message: <200411301456.19900.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> "Daniel O'Connor" writes: : On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:35, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > Can't you just add modules override with absolute path name? : : I don't think so, because.. MODULES_OVERRIDE is different. It can take a list of paths to upgrade. : On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:08, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: : > Any chance you can use the recently added PORTS_MODULES knob to do what : > you want? : : Hmm.. I don't really see how that can work actually.. : If you already have the port installed it will barf unless you set : FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. That's just a minor bug I've not yet fixed. : Also, it would force an upgrade of the port which isn't necessarily : a good thing (eg I can't use the latest nvidia port because the 6113 : driver blows up on my laptop). That's up to the user to manage :-( Warner