From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 14 15:52:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6D91065673;
	Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EE523CF2B;
	Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:52:00 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E47EF20.8000409@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:52:00 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <201108020942.p729g1Ti068765@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20110811180338.GB88978@hades.panopticon>
	<CADLo839VotWbi209+eR3LAuQ4HqC-LSGY4avcUFXHat=HjsrKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110812093328.GE85247@hades.panopticon>
	<b0535f6d53bb546b54d85797ec66cf0b@etoilebsd.net>
	<20110812101133.GF85247@hades.panopticon>
	<4E4584EA.7090306@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110813133717.GA38385@hades.panopticon>
	<4E469837.1030903@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110813172040.GC38385@hades.panopticon>
	<20110814030033.GA80255@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110814030033.GA80255@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.ORG>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/cad/admesh Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:52:01 -0000

Am 14.08.2011 05:00, schrieb Alexey Dokuchaev:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:20:40PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>> * Matthias Andree (mandree@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>>> Possibly we should always mark ports for removal for three months after
>>> the point in time when the maintainer gets reset to ports@.
>>
>> Nice. Well that'll only result in two processes: more and more ports
>> will have maintainers reset and then removed, and remaining maintainers
>> will take more and more ports beyond their ability to maintain them,
>> both will lead to collapse. Is this also not undesirable?
> 
> Big +1 for Dmitry here; ports@ is perfectly fine maintainer entity, much
> easier to work with, and often receives more and better care than many of
> seemingly "properly" maintained ports.

Assuming that were true, how else do we make sure not to let rotten code
linger in the ports tree?