Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:09:11 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union? Message-ID: <ygehdprh7m0.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040921161420.GA17290@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <200409200250.49518.max@love2party.net> <20040921100220.GC842@empiric.icir.org> <20040921161420.GA17290@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
>>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> said:
brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
brooks> work with. A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
brooks> best approach.
I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygehdprh7m0.wl%ume>