Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 May 2007 17:05:17 +0200
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade
Message-ID:  <20070525150517.GA63514@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200705251602.48778.shoesoft@gmx.net>
References:  <20070525095146.GA45288@freebsd.org> <200705251602.48778.shoesoft@gmx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:02:47PM +0200, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 11:51:46 Roman Divacky wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > I just noticed that
> > spravci ~# ls -l /boot/kernel*/kernel
> > -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  3389971 May 18 12:03 /boot/kernel.old/kernel*
> > -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  5211345 May 25 11:47 /boot/kernel/kernel*
> >
> > ie. after gcc42 import the kernel size increased roughly by 60% thats
> > a little too much. is there any forgotten option or something that
> > makes the kernel grow so big?
> 
> While I also see an increase, it's not that much.
> 
> GENERIC from today's current, also compiled with gcc34 from ports (I had to 
> delete two gcc options in sys/conf/kern.mk):
> 
> gcc34: 6530916
> gcc42: 7352560
> gcc34 -Os: 6074468
> gcc42 -Os: 10058032

yes, thats it! I also used -Os. it looks like this occurs only with -Os optimization
level.

can someone else confirm this? and/or possibly explain this?

thnx

roman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070525150517.GA63514>