Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Oct 2019 11:59:10 +0400
From:      Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>
To:        Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r513679 - head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs/files
Message-ID:  <CALH631=WA=D2gRWG4t72CMr4Z%2BOt5303ZV-1ng0uQ0ZiRGs1WA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191006054444.GB62549@urd.tobik.me>
References:  <201910031745.x93Hje5x059120@repo.freebsd.org> <20191006054444.GB62549@urd.tobik.me>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 9:44 AM Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 05:45:40PM +0000, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > Author: mi
> > Date: Thu Oct  3 17:45:39 2019
> > New Revision: 513679
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/513679
> >
> > Log:
> >   Add a patch from upstream, fixing the author's typo in an option's
> name.
> >   It only affects users of libsecret, which is off by default -- thus no
> >   port-revision bump.
>
> That's not a valid reason not to bump PORTREVISION.  Please bump
> it so that users how happen to build it with LIBSECRET=on get your
> fix automatically.
>

I have been told that PORTREVISION should be bumped whenever output package
changes. It isn't the case here. Or am I mistaken?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631=WA=D2gRWG4t72CMr4Z%2BOt5303ZV-1ng0uQ0ZiRGs1WA>