Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:54:21 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Eric S Pulley <pulley@dabus.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Functional KDE desktop Message-ID: <4CDFA3FC-B04E-4879-896F-1FFDBE05648A@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20130317103205.3dcefc7e@aldebaran.dabus.com> References: <2B43A76D-345F-4FE1-86A5-680BC3318423@gsoft.com.au> <20130317103205.3dcefc7e@aldebaran.dabus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18/03/2013, at 3:02, Eric S Pulley <pulley@dabus.com> wrote: > I have it working fine here. I originally was using it on 9.0 then I > upgraded everything but that didn't work well for the KDE 4.8->4.9 > update in ports. Too many ports were split and moved around so I ended > up removing all ports and remaking them all. One big gotcha is make > sure you force a reconfigure on everything. > > My small nightmare was kdepim,kdepim-runtime and kdepimlibs > there are now two deferment types of PIM you can built the old "4.8 > style" and the new. Make sure you are consistent as these packages are > deps for many others. For a while I was still picking up settings for > the old style and it was breaking all over the place. Ugh I see. Any idea what these options are called? > If you want I can send you a list of all the stuff I have installed off > list and you can see if you're somehow missing important bits... I ended up nuking all of KDE/Qt and will try again. I also have had troubles with Python updates and a few things. I really like ports when installing but they are terrible when upgrading :( -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CDFA3FC-B04E-4879-896F-1FFDBE05648A>