Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 05:41:45 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: d@delphij.net, delphij@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, kpaasial@gmail.com, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why default route is not installed last? Message-ID: <20130903.054145.729685298814952552.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <521BA31C.5000807@delphij.net> References: <CA%2B7WWSfN1PJ-9h2Z6YtLvO7_yv4vESf4beY4RzyvpW-unkdLkg@mail.gmail.com> <521B9A1B.7080908@freebsd.org> <521BA31C.5000807@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep__3_05_41_45_2013_061)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote in <521BA31C.5000807@delphij.net>: de> > That has always been specifically not supported. default route de> > needs to be directly attached. in fact the routing tables only ever de> > deliver the 'next hop' de> de> Well, depends on whether the 'next hop' is an IP or an interface. For de> instance one can have a valid configuration that they have a static de> route of: de> de> 2607:5300:XXXX:XXXX:ff:ff:ff:ff -prefixlen 128 -interface em0 de> de> Then have 2607:5300:XXXX:XXXX:ff:ff:ff:ff as default router. de> de> This configuration is not possible with the current rc.d startup order. Ah, I see. I personally do not like this kind of configurations but it should be supported as a dirty workaround. The patch is correct, so please go ahead with it. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep__3_05_41_45_2013_061)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlIk+AkACgkQTyzT2CeTzy27hACdGQ87Ml7IBvsa2h+rBaf3F8Mt VSYAoI7s+sRHhqgKKBANWX0npJLDoNc2 =IHF1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep__3_05_41_45_2013_061)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130903.054145.729685298814952552.hrs>