From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 31 12:33:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (rdu57-28-046.nc.rr.com [66.57.28.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884A437B401 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marcus@localhost) by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7VJXw936228 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:33:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shumai.marcuscom.com: marcus owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:33:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Joe Clarke To: Subject: Question on updated port Message-ID: <20010831153233.M90431-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm about to release a new version of net/netatalk, and I have a question. A few of the patches disappeared between pre6 and pre7. I have a diff -ruN of the new pre7 directory to the existing pre6 port directory. Is that the correct way to submit the update patch? Is there a better way of doing things to indicate a patch went away? Thanks. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message