From owner-freebsd-fs Fri Jun 23 2:29:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB3D37B949 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 02:29:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Received: from gateway.posi.net (user-2inip0p.dialup.mindspring.com [165.121.100.25]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA29734; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 05:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (kbyanc@localhost) by gateway.posi.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA10780; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 01:26:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 01:26:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Yancey To: Marius Bendiksen Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Amendment to previous suggestion re/msdosfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Marius Bendiksen wrote: > After closer examination, making a mapping from the system bit to the > immutable bit would be more semantically correct. > Sounds like a good idea to me. Kelly -- Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@posi.net - Belmont, CA System Administrator, eGroups.com http://www.egroups.com/ Maintainer, BSD Driver Database http://www.posi.net/freebsd/drivers/ Coordinator, Team FreeBSD http://www.posi.net/freebsd/Team-FreeBSD/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message