Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 May 1999 16:06:18 -0400 
From:      Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   ICQ Behind NAT (Was: question about 2 subnets on the same switch. )
Message-ID:  <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB440110586C@site2s1>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pardon my intrusion, but why is this so problematic?  I've been running ICQ
behind my firewall w/o any apparent problems.  Maybe I just haven't noticed
them.

Also, on that note, what SOCKS proxy would you recommend?

-Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Thomas@hentschel.net [SMTP:Thomas@hentschel.net]
> Sent:	Tuesday, May 04, 1999 12:34 AM
> To:	Doug White
> Cc:	questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject:	Re: question about 2 subnets on the same switch.
> 
> On  3 May, Doug White wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I *HIGHLY* recommend SOCKS for ICQ.  ICQ has such a twisted protocol
> it's
> > insane to run it behind a firewall any other way. I have it set up on a
> > client's gateway and it works flawlessly.  
> 
> 	Thanks for that, I was wondering why it was crapping out
> 
> 	-Th


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB440110586C>