From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 8 13: 5: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns.clientlogic.com (ns.clientlogic.com [207.51.66.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F021543D for ; Sat, 8 May 1999 13:04:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ChrisMic@clientlogic.com) Received: by site0s1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Sat, 8 May 1999 16:04:58 -0400 Message-ID: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB440110586C@site2s1> From: Christopher Michaels To: Doug White Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ICQ Behind NAT (Was: question about 2 subnets on the same switch. ) Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 16:06:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Pardon my intrusion, but why is this so problematic? I've been running ICQ behind my firewall w/o any apparent problems. Maybe I just haven't noticed them. Also, on that note, what SOCKS proxy would you recommend? -Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas@hentschel.net [SMTP:Thomas@hentschel.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 12:34 AM > To: Doug White > Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: question about 2 subnets on the same switch. > > On 3 May, Doug White wrote: > > > > > I *HIGHLY* recommend SOCKS for ICQ. ICQ has such a twisted protocol > it's > > insane to run it behind a firewall any other way. I have it set up on a > > client's gateway and it works flawlessly. > > Thanks for that, I was wondering why it was crapping out > > -Th To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message