From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 17:18:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7C6106567C for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Dave.Robison@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF268FC14 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa01.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5LHHZmc011216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:18:13 -0500 Received: from lefty.vicor.com (10.14.152.63) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:18:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4FE35745.9060601@fisglobal.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:17:57 -0700 From: "Robison, Dave" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20120621015237.GB58187@neutralgood.org> <4FE35208.40708@queernet.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.63] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.260, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-06-21_03:2012-06-21, 2012-06-21, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: david.robison@fisglobal.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:18:15 -0000 On 06/21/2012 10:08, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> You seem to be unaware of what percentage of the development and >> maintenance staff and the money to pay for them comes from those >> commercial users. If FreeBSD cannot maintain the critical mass to >> continue, it will not continue. > > but why it isn't clearly stated: > > "We put clang because sponsors wanted it." > Because there's no reason to do that. It's an asinine suggestion. Clang is here to stay. Most of us are happy about that decision. GCC will still be in the ports tree for those of you who prefer to run it. Your questions have been answered repeatedly, ad nauseam, but apparently you don't like and won't accept the answers so you ask the questions again and again. You don't like Clang. You prefer GCC. We get it. -- Dave Robison Sales Solution Architect II FIS Banking Solutions 510/621-2089 (w) 530/518-5194 (c) 510/621-2020 (f) daver@vicor.com david.robison@fisglobal.com _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.