Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:15:49 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/raid3 g_raid3.c g_raid3.h Message-ID: <20041020181549.1cbc2bd3@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <200410150611.i9F6BSRd066269@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200410150611.i9F6BSRd066269@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 06:11:28 +0000 (UTC), Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> pjd 2004-10-15 06:11:28 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_5)
> sys/geom/raid3 g_raid3.c g_raid3.h
> Log:
> - There is no need to skip providers with 0 sectorsize in taste routine
> anymore.
Does this apply for raid5 too? I'm getting all sorts of zero sector size
errors with a machine upgraded from RELENG_4 - but depending on when I
bring vinum up!
If I try to boot with vinum enabled, I get a dangling vnode panic.
If I try to boot without vinum and have a vinum.sh startup that does a
vinum start and a mount, I get a wrong sectorsize error and lose one of
the six disks (ending up in degraded mode).
The only way to get things up is to boot -s, ``fsck -p'', ``vinum start'',
then continue to multi-user.
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020181549.1cbc2bd3>