Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:51:07 +0200 From: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD? Message-ID: <CA%2B7WWSfF=Vz3zsS-Z0wkPCSvVy0TPJOwFDSHNzTd3Pb4bQaUaw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B7WWSde%2BgbpXnGTSpe-Jx6fErYbtN=s5oSdr1KqoD0=STnUxg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201302082017.r18KHk7k036221@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <CA%2B7WWSde%2BgbpXnGTSpe-Jx6fErYbtN=s5oSdr1KqoD0=STnUxg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: >> From bf1783@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013 >> >> > > I don't think it's true. >> > > While still on 9.1 ports, the latest >> > > entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now) >> > > about NOV-2012. I believe the revision was >> > > also substantially lower. >> > > >> > > AS soon as I switched to head, >> > > the latest entry in UPDATING is from >> > > 6-FEB-2013 and the revision is 311942. >> > > >> > > Or maybe I misunderstood you? >> > >> > You do. :-) >> > The local _subversion repository_ (I know I'm using incorrent >> > terminology) has a revision number: r######. Which is the same >> > across different versions of FreeBSD. >> > The individual ports _maintained within that repository_ have >> > their individual ports numbers (e.g. libreoffice-3.6.5) ... which >> > also does not vary with the FreeBSD release. One can have >> > libreoffice-3.6.5 and libreoffice 3.5.4 - but those are two separate >> > ports and both work (or should) on 8.3, 9.1, and -CURRENT. If a >> > port has a minimum (or maximum) release of the OS it supports, there >> > a mechanism for figuring that out and DTRT. >> > >> > Or did I misunderstand you? >> >> Yes, it is now branched, and he was probably using the equivalent of: >> >> http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/ports/branches/RELENG_9_1_0/ >> >> rather than >> >> http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/ports/head/ >> >> By the way, Anton, you may wish to use https:// rather than svn:// -- >> slightly less efficient, but more secure. >> >> yes, got it, cool! >> >> root@zzz:/root # svn info /usr/ports/ >> Path: /usr/ports >> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports >> URL: https://svn0.us-east.freebsd.org/ports/head >> Repository Root: https://svn0.us-east.freebsd.org/ports >> Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 >> Revision: 311950 >> Node Kind: directory >> Schedule: normal >> Last Changed Author: eadler >> Last Changed Rev: 311950 >> Last Changed Date: 2013-02-08 19:18:40 +0000 (Fri, 08 Feb 2013) >> >> root@zzz:/root # >> >> Does svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head >> support https too? >> >> Thanks >> >> Anton >> >> > > Just to repeat what others have tried to tell you. The ports tree is > NOT branched. The branches/RELENG_9_1_0 thing is a "tag" in subversion > terminology, a read only-snapshot of head from the time the release > was made that will never be updated. > > -Kimmo Actually I'm talking slightly rubbish here, the tags are in the tags/* part of the repository, for example http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/tags/RELEASE_9_1_0. The branches/RELENG_9_1_0 thing is a proper branch but since there's no announcement of what it should used for I would guess it's someone's test branch. -Kimmo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B7WWSfF=Vz3zsS-Z0wkPCSvVy0TPJOwFDSHNzTd3Pb4bQaUaw>